When planning your wedding, there’s a moment where the question comes up: Do we need a second photographer? And honestly? The answer isn’t one-size-fits-all. Some couples absolutely benefit from having a second shooter, especially if you’re dreaming of multiple angles, a jam-packed timeline, or coverage of both of you getting ready in totally different locations. But other times, it’s totally not necessary. So, come read about the pros and cons of hiring a second photographer for your wedding because I’ve seen both sides, and I’ve got thoughts!

The Pros of Hiring a Second Photographer for Your Wedding

Double the Coverage, Double the Memories

Let’s start with the obvious: two photographers = more moments captured. While I’m photographing you walking down the aisle, my second shooter might be catching your partner’s teary-eyed reaction. While I’m with you during golden hour portraits, they might be snapping cocktail hour candids with your guests. Basically, it allows us to be in two places at once, and that means a fuller, richer story of your day.

More Candid, In-Between Moments

With two photographers, there’s more room to catch those blink-and-you-miss-it moments. The big ones first looks, first kiss, first dance, are always covered. But it’s the little moments (your grandma giggling at the speeches or your bestie fixing your veil) that often get captured when there’s a second pair of eyes floating around with a camera!

Smoother Timeline Coverage

If you’re getting ready in two separate places or your timeline is tight having a second shooter helps us divide and conquer. No rushing, no missing key moments, it just gives us more flexibility and less stress for everyone involved.

The Cons of Hiring a Second Photographer for Your Wedding

Not Always Necessary for Smaller or Slower-Paced Days

If you’re planning an intimate celebration, a micro wedding, or something with a more relaxed timeline, you probably don’t need a second shooter. I can capture everything beautifully on my own and sometimes fewer people behind the camera makes things feel more cozy and laid-back, especially for camera-shy couples.

Additional Cost

Second shooters aren’t free (womp womp), so if you’re keeping a close eye on your budget, that’s something to factor in. Depending on the photographer, adding a second shooter could range anywhere from a few hundred to over a thousand dollars. I always walk my couples through the options and help decide if it’s really necessary for their specific day!

Consistency in Editing and Style

This is rare, but worth mentioning some photographers don’t use second shooters often, and when they do, editing styles or shooting approaches can feel a little different. With my team, I always work with people I trust so the gallery still feels cohesive and you. But it’s definitely something to ask about when you’re booking!

So… Should You Hire a Second Photographer for Your Wedding?

Here’s the real talk: If you’re having a big wedding, getting ready in different places, have a packed schedule, or want lots of guest candids yes, a second shooter is 1000% worth it. But if you’re keeping things small and simple, or you just really vibe with a more low-key, documentary approach, one photographer might be all you need. When we work together, I’ll always help you figure out what works best for your day. My job isn’t just to show up with a camera it’s to guide you through the decisions that actually impact your experience and your photos!

Ready to Talk About Your Wedding Day Coverage?

Ruzin Cunningham Photo | Georgia & Destination Wedding Photographer

Whether you’re still on the fence or already know exactly what you want, let’s chat it out. We’ll talk through your timeline, your vision, and whether a second shooter would enhance your day or if solo coverage is all you need. Either way, I’ve got you. Head to my contact page so we can further talk about it! If you want to learn more about me and what I do, click here. Can’t wait to hear from you!